Structures and functions

The cylinder block is the basic framework of a car engine. It supports and holds all the other engine components. Figure 2.1 shows a typical cylinder block without an integrated crankcase. Figure 2.2 shows the block with the upper part of the crankcase included. Figure 2.31 schematically illustrates the relative positions of the cylinder, piston and piston ring. The cylinder is a large hole machined in the cylinder block, surrounded by the cylinder wall.
The piston rapidly travels back and forth in the cylinder under combustion pressure. The cylinder wall guides the moving piston, receives the combustion pressure, and conveys combustion heat outside the engine. Figure 2.4 gives an analysis of the materials needed for a cylinder with high output power and summarizes the reasons why a specific material or technology is chosen to fulfil a required function. A more detailed description is given in Appendix B.
The black portions in Fig. 2.3 indicate the areas that are most exposed to friction. These parts need to be carefully designed not only from the viewpoint of lubrication but also tribology, as this has a significant influence on engine performance. Tribology can be defined as the science and technology of interacting surfaces in relative motion, and includes the study of friction, wear and lubrication. Combustion heat discharges at a very high rate and, if not diffused, the raised temperature can lead to tribological problems.





  • READ MORE.......






  • The science and technology of materials in automotive engines
    Hiroshi Yamagata
    Woodhead Publishing and Maney Publishing
    on behalf of
    The Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining
    CRC Press
    Boca Raton Boston New York Washington, DC
    WOODHEAD PUBLISHING LIMITED
    Cambridge England





    for more details and updates about automotive-technology-guide please visit.........
    www.automotive-technology-guide.com

    ---or---



  • www.automotive-technology-guide.com





  • Battery Technologies

    The battery is the critical technology for electric vehicles, providing both energy and power storage. Unfortunately, the weak link of batteries has been their low energy storage capacity-on a weight basis, lower than gasoline by a factor of 100 to 400. Power capacity may also be a problem, especially for some of the higher temperature and higher energy batteries. In fact, power capacity is the more crucial factor for hybrid vehicles, where the battery’s major function is to be a load leveler for the engine, not to store energy.1 Aside from increasing energy and power storage, other key goals of battery R&D are increasing longevity and efficiency and reducing costs.
    Numerous battery types are in various stages of development. Although there are multiple claims for the efficacy of each type, there is a large difference between the performance of small modules or even full battery packs under nondemanding laboratory tests, and performance in the challenging environment of actual vehicle service or tests designed to duplicate this situation. Although the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium is sponsoring such tests, the key results are confidential, and much of the publicly available information comes from the battery manufacturers themselves, and may be unreliable. Nevertheless, it is quite clear that a number of the batteries in development will prove superior to the dominant conventional lead acid battery,2 though at a higher purchase price. Promising candidates include advanced lead acid (e.g., woven-grid semi-bipolar and bipolar) with specific energy of 35 to 50 Wh/kg, specific power of 200 to 900 W/kg,3 and claimed lifetimes of five years and longer; nickel metal hydride with 80 Wh/kg and 200 W/kg specific energy and power, and claimed very long lifetimes; lithium polymer, considered potentially to be an especially “EV friendly” battery (they are spillage proof and maintenance free), that claims specific energy and power of 200 or more Wh/kg and 100 or more W/kg; lithium-ion, which has demonstrated specific energy of 100 to 110 Wh/kg; and many others. The claimed values of battery lifetime in vehicle applications should be considered extremely uncertain. With the possible exception of some of the very near-term advanced lead acid batteries, each of the battery types has significant remaining challenges to commercialization—high costs, corrosion and thermal management problems, gas buildup during charging, and so forth. Further, the history of battery commercialization demonstrates that bringing a battery to market demands an extensive probationary period: once a battery has moved beyond the single cell stage, it will require a testing time of nearly a decade or more before it can be considered a proven production model.



  • READ MORE.......






  • Advanced Automotive Technology: Visions
    of a Super-Efficient Family Car
    OTA-ETI-638
    GPO stock #052-003-01440-8




    for more details and updates about automotive-technology-guide please visit.........
    www.automotive-technology-guide.com

    ---or---

  • www.automotive-technology-guide.com

  • Spark Ignition and Diesel Engines

    Spark Ignition Engines
    Although spark ignition (SI) engines have been the dominant passenger car and light truck powerplant in the
    United States for many decades, there are several ways to achieve additional improvements in efficiency---either through wider use of some existing technologies or by introduction of advanced technologies and engine concepts.
    Some key examples of improved technology, most having some current application, are:
    -Advanced electronic controls; improved understanding of combustion processes. Improved thermodynamic
    efficiency through improved spark timing, increased compression ratios, and faster combustion.
    -Use of lightweight materials in valves, valve springs, and pistons, advanced coatings on pistons and ring
    surfaces, improved lubricants. Reduced mechanical friction.
    -Increased number of valves per cylinder (up to five), variable timing for valve opening, deactivating cylinders at light loads, variable tuning of intakes to increase intake pressure. Reduce “pumping losses” caused by throttling the flow of intake air to reduce power output.
    Combining the full range of improvements in a conventional engine can yield fuel economy improvements of up to 15 percent from a baseline four-valve engine.
    Besides improvements in engine components, new engine concepts promise additional benefits. The highest
    level of technology refinement for SI engines is the direct injection stratified charge (DISC) engine. DISC engines inject fuel directly into the cylinder rather than premixing fuel and air, as conventional engines do; the term “stratified charge” comes from the need to aim the injected fuel at the spark plug, so the fuel-air mixture in the cylinder is highly nonuniform. DISC engines are almost unthrottled; power is reduced by reducing the amount of fuel injected, not the amount of air. As a result, these engines have virtually no throttling loss and can operate at high compression ratios (because not premixing the fuel and air avoids premature ignition). DISC engines have been researched for decades without successful commercialization, but substantial improvements in fuel injection technology and in the understanding and control of combustion, and a more optimistic outlook for nitrogen oxide (NOX) catalysts that can operate in an oxygen-rich environment make the outlook for such engines promising. The estimated fuel economy benefit of a DISC engine coupled with available friction-reduction technology and variable valve timing ranges from 20 to 33 percent, compared to a baseline four-valve engine.
    Diesel Engines
    Automakers can achieve a substantial improvement in fuel economy by shifting to compression ignition (diesel)
    engines. Diesels are more efficient than gasoline engines for two reasons. First, they use compression ratios of
    16:1 to 24:1 versus the gasoline engine’s 10:1 or so, which allows a higher thermodynamic efficiency. Second,
    diesels do not experience the pumping loss characteristic of gasoline engines because they do not throttle their
    intake air; instead, power is controlled by regulating fuel flow alone. Diesels have much higher internal friction than gasoline engines, however, and they are heavier for the same output.
    Diesels are not popular in the U.S. market because they generally have been noisier, more prone to vibration,
    more polluting, and costlier than comparable gasoline engines. Although they have low hydrocarbon (HC) and
    carbon monoxide (CO) emissions, they have relatively high NOX and particulate emissions.

    The latest designs of diesel engines recently unveiled in Europe are far superior to previous designs. Oxidation
    catalysts and better fuel control have substantially improved particulate emission performance. Four-valve per
    cylinder design and direct injection2 have separately led to better fuel economy, higher output per unit weight, and lower emissions—though NOX emissions are still too high. Compared with a current gasoline engine, the fourvalve indirect injection design will yield about a 25 percent mpg gain (about 12 percent gain on a fuel
    energy basis), while the direct injection (Dl) design may yield as much as a 40 percent gain (30 percent fuel
    energy gain).
    The new diesels are likely to meet California’s LEV standards for HC, CO, and particulate, but will continue to require a NOX waiver to comply with emission requirements. Although the four-valve design and other innovations (e.g., improved exhaust gas recirculation and improved fuel injection) will improve emissions performance and may allow compliance with federal Tier 1 standards, LEV standards cannot be met without a NOX reduction catalyst.
    Although manufacturers are optimistic about such catalysts for gasoline engines, they consider a diesel catalyst to be a much more difficult challenge




  • READ MORE.......







  • Advanced Automotive Technology: Visions
    of a Super-Efficient Family Car
    OTA-ETI-638
    GPO stock #052-003-01440-8



    for more details and updates about automotive-technology-guide please visit.........
    www.automotive-technology-guide.com

    ---or---



  • www.automotive-technology-guide.com





  • Operating systems

    In engines with overhead valves (OHV), the camshaft is either mounted in the cylinder block, or in the cylinder head with an overhead camshaft (OHC).
    Figure 2.2 shows an OHV drive in which the valves are driven by the camshaft via cam followers, push rods, and rocker arms. Since the drive to the camshaft is simple (either belt or chain) and the only machining is in the cylinder block, this is a  cost-effective arrangement.In the OHC drive shown in Fig. 2.3 the camshaft is mounted directly over the valve stems. Alternatively it could be offset and the valves operated using rockers. The valve clearance could then be adjusted by altering the pivot height. Once again, the drive to the camshaft is by toothed belt or chain.
    In the system shown in Fig. 2.3 the camshaft operates on a follower or bucket. The clearance between the valve tip and the follower is adjusted by a shim. This is more difficult to adjust than in systems using rockers, but is less likely to change. The spring retainer is attached to the valve using a tapered split collet. The valve guides are usually press-fitted into the cylinder head, so that they can be replaced when worn. Valve seat
    inserts are used to ensure minimal wear. The valves rotate in order to ensure even wear and to maintain good seating. This rotation is promoted by having the cam offset from the valve stem axis. This also helps to avoid localized wear on the cam follower




    E N G I N E E R I N G R E S E A R C H S E R I E S
    Automotive Engine Valve Recession
    R Lewis and R S Dwyer-Joyce
    Series Editor
    Duncan Dowson
    Professional Engineering Publishing Limited,
    London and Bury St Edmunds, UK













  • READ MORE.......







  • for more details and updates about automotive-technology-guide please visit.........
    www.automotive-technology-guide.com

    ---or---



  • www.automotive-technology-guide.com

  • Advantages and disadvantages of reciprocating engines

    An engine with a piston-cylinder mechanism has the following advantages:
    1. It is possible to seal the gap between the piston and the cylinder, resulting in high compression ratio, high heat efficiency and low fuel consumption.
    2. The piston ring faces the cylinder bore wall, separated by an oil film. The resulting hydrodynamic lubrication generates low friction and high durability.
    3. The piston loses speed at the dead-center points where the travelling direction reverses, which gives enough time for combustion and intake as well as for exhaust.
    However, the reciprocating engine also has disadvantages:
    1. The unbalanced inertial force and resulting piston ‘slap’ can cause noise
    and vibration.
    2. It is difficult to reuse the exhaust heat. The rotary engine (Wankel engine) is one of the few alternatives that have been mass produced and installed in production vehicles. However, none of
    them has been as popular as the piston-cylinder mechanism to date.



  • READ MORE.......



  • The science and technology of materials in automotive engines
    Hiroshi Yamagata
    Woodhead Publishing and Maney Publishing
    on behalf of
    The Institute of Materials, Minerals & Mining
    CRC Press
    Boca Raton Boston New York Washington, DC
    WOODHEAD PUBLISHING LIMITED
    Cambridge England



    for more details and updates about automotive-technology-guide please visit.........
    www.automotive-technology-guide.com

    ---or---

  • www.automotive-technology-guide.com

  •